As Jim Brown’s Guest I thought,
unlike Jim, I would try and stir up some controversy and hopefully some
intellectually driven feedback via the comments. So based upon my 10 years
working in Business Support and Computer Roles (2006 – 2016) within the National
Probation Service and then a CRC getting PO’s to take any interest in Business Processes
and Computers Systems was a mission impossible. Yes there was the odd PO that
took an interest but for most of them the moment the first PowerPoint displayed
a Process Flowchart then their eyes rolled and any engagement ceased. Based
upon my earlier Guest Post on here which included an outstanding Offender
Management Workflow Diagram this received no feedback whatsoever. So things
haven’t changed since 2016 when I was made redundant by the CRC. Significantly
they weren’t interested in what I had to offer either but for another reason.
They decided to dispose of me to avoid having to listen to the complexity of
the Business and Computer Processes they needed to support having acquired the
business. They had been sold the idea by the Government that it was a simple
straightforward “client services” business just needing some basic computer
systems that kept the client off the premises. For starters nobody had told
them about the hundred plus variations in Court Sentences that a Court could
apply and expected you to service and report back in different ways. So why do the
majority of the PO elk show no interest in Business Processes and Computer
Systems.
So being a bit of a Techie Nerd I decided to ask Artificial
Intelligence (AI) in the form of the ChatGPT App why this was the case. Its
response is below which I thought being only a machine designed to do a bit of
thinking it described it in a very almost social reformist genre and how I
envisaged a Humanist PO describing it to me as a Determinist Techie.
The challenge that professionals in the social sciences
face in taking an interest in business processes and computer systems can stem
from several factors related to mindset, training, and the nature of the fields
themselves. Here are some of the main reasons:
1. Different Educational Backgrounds
Social scientists typically focus on human behavior, society, and cultural
dynamics, while business processes and computer systems are more technical,
structured, and data-driven.
The academic training in social sciences often emphasizes qualitative analysis,
critical thinking, and understanding societal structures, which may seem
disconnected from the quantitative, efficiency-driven focus of business
processes and computer systems.
2. Perception of Relevance
Social scientists might see business processes and computer systems as outside
their primary area of interest. They may perceive these fields as more
concerned with corporate or economic efficiency rather than with the broader
societal issues they study, like inequality, politics, or human development.
This perception can make it difficult for social scientists to appreciate the
potential role of business and technology in shaping societal outcomes.
3. Cultural Divide
There is often a cultural divide between social science disciplines, which
prioritize human experience, and the more technical fields of business and IT,
which prioritize logic, systems, and structure.
Social scientists might view business and computer systems as too rigid or
focused on profit rather than the human element, making it harder to relate to
or engage with.
4. Complexity of Business and IT Systems
Business processes and computer systems can be highly technical and require
specialized knowledge in areas like software development, systems design, and
financial metrics, which may be outside the typical training of social
scientists.
The complexity and jargon-heavy nature of these fields can be daunting or
appear irrelevant unless there is a strong reason to engage with them.
5. Priorities and Research Focus
Social science professionals are often concerned with addressing societal
issues like social justice, ethics, and human well-being, which can seem
disconnected from the business world’s emphasis on efficiency, profitability,
and system optimization.
Their focus on social theory, human interaction, and societal improvement can
make business processes and computer systems seem like secondary concerns or
less impactful on the human condition.
6. Interdisciplinary Gaps
There has historically been a lack of interdisciplinary education and
collaboration between the social sciences and fields like business and
information technology. Without formal integration, these professionals may not
have the tools or language to bridge these gaps easily.
However, fields like digital sociology or organizational behavior are emerging
to address this disconnect, helping to show how technology and business
processes shape human experience.
7. Concerns About Ethics and Impact
Social scientists might also be wary of the ethics and societal impact of
business processes and computer systems. They may be concerned about the
effects of automation, surveillance, or corporate behavior on social
inequality, privacy, or the environment.
This ethical concern can create skepticism or reluctance to engage deeply with
these systems, unless they see a clear societal benefit.
While these are common reasons for the disconnect, there is increasing
recognition of the value of integrating social science perspectives into business
and technology. Understanding the human factors in systems design, organisational
behaviour, and user experience can lead to more ethical and user-friendly
solutions. Cross-disciplinary approaches are gaining momentum to bridge these
gaps.